Phil Goff

Wellington, May 12 NZPA - Christine Rankin is the wrong person to be appointed to the Families Commission, as she is divisive, has a troubled record and is unrepresentative, Labour leader Phil Goff said today.

Green MP Sue Bradford said National was subverting the commission through political appointments, and accused it of sabotage.

The Families Commission was set up as a Crown agency to promote better understanding of families issues as part of a support deal between United Future and Labour following the 2002 election.

National was previously scathing of it but agreed to retain it as part of its post-election support agreement with United Future leader Peter Dunne.

Social Development Minister Paula Bennett announced the appointment of former head of Winz (now Work and Income) Ms Rankin, and Bruce Pilbrow, chief executive of the advice service Parents Inc, saying they were strong advocates for children and families. There are seven commissioners.

Prime Minister John Key said Ms Rankin was passionate in campaigning against child abuse.

It was reported Cabinet hotly debated Ms Rankin's appointment.

Mr Goff said he was astounded and said Ms Rankin's personal friends prevailed in the Cabinet debate.

"She is obviously a very controversial and divisive figure," he told reporters.

"The last time we had a recession she was spending several hundred thousand on hiring a private plane and a luxury lodge for her chief executives.

"Is that the sort of message we want to send out?"

Ms Rankin was not reappointed as Winz chief executive after staging the spectacular conference with a price tag of $235,000. She then lost a colourful legal challenge to her dismissal in 2001.

Ms Rankin led a group opposed to Ms Bradford's anti-smacking legislation -- which National voted for. As head of For The Sake Of Our Children Trust she went head to head with former Children's Commissioner Cindy Kiro and child advocate groups.

Ms Rankin argued the law change, removing the defence of reasonable force when parent was charged was charged with assaulting a child, would make thousands of parents criminals.

"She's attacked groups like Barnado's and others that she will now be required to work with," Mr Goff said.

During the anti-smacking debate Ms Rankin referred to former Prime Minister Helen Clark as childless, which Mr Goff said was an unacceptable personal attack.

Ms Bradford said the Families Commission supported her bill.

"Ms Rankin's appointment seems like a deliberate move that will divide the commission. This amounts to a form of political sabotage," Ms Bradford said.

The law was working well and police were happy with it, she said.

"I'm extremely concerned about the influence Ms Rankin's view may have on the future of the commission's work on violence against children, and the future of the commission itself."

Mr Goff said Ms Rankin aligned herself so exclusively with one side of the political spectrum, for example attending Destiny Church and Families First rallies, that it was hard to see how she could be representative.

Mr Key said despite her record he considered Ms Rankin a safe pair of hands whose priority would be families.

"I don't think she will actually agree with the National Party on certain issues, we've taken a different response for instance with smacking -- she has been a strong proponent the other way."

Ms Bennett said she had argued for the appointment.

"I think we were pretty strong in putting her forward, and she certainly presented well," she told reporters.

"I think Christine has some pretty strong views on things, I think she will bring those views to the commission and as a consequence the decisions that come out of it will be fairly robust."

Lobby group Family First NZ welcomed the appointments.

"Both Christine and Bruce will bring the Commission `down to earth' and rather than being blinded by ideology, it will hopefully start listening to the voice of families and advocating for them in a relevant way," said Bob McCoskrie, national director of Family First.

NZPA PAR mt il co kn